Home / Definitions that do work
Twenty terms, answered immediately and linked to the workflow each belongs to. No filler, no hype.
Software that assists IP professionals with patents, trademarks, copyright, designs and trade secrets — searching, analyzing, drafting and monitoring.
Software assisting patent professionals with prior-art search, novelty assessment, drafting, office-action response and portfolio analysis.
All public information available before a filing date — patents, publications, public use, sales — that can defeat novelty.
A single-reference test: does one prior-art document disclose every element of the claimed invention?
Whether the invention would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art — 35 U.S.C. §103 in the US, inventive step at the EPO.
Whether making, using or selling a product risks infringing in-force patents in a market — different from patentability.
The numbered sentences at the end of a patent that define the legal scope of protection — what others may not do.
A table mapping each claim limitation to supporting or anticipating evidence, row by row — the workhorse of invalidity and FTO analysis.
A patent examiner’s written rejection or objection — commonly under §101 (subject matter), §102 (novelty), §103 (obviousness) or §112 (written description) — requiring a response with amendments or arguments.
The back-and-forth with the patent office from filing to grant: office actions, responses, interviews, appeals.
Assessing whether a proposed mark is available — searching identical and similar marks and weighing confusion factors before use or filing.
The core trademark test: would consumers likely confuse two marks, given mark similarity, goods relatedness, channels and other jurisdiction-specific factors?
Watching new filings, uses and marketplaces for conflicting marks after clearance — a developing SallyIP capability, not a shipped product.
Checking that each cited source exists, was retrieved for the current answer, and actually says what the answer claims — including word-for-word quote checks.
Fluent but false legal output: invented cases, misquoted statutes, or real citations supporting wrong conclusions.
An architecture where retrieval and verification gate every answer — evidence first, quote checks, citation-integrity guard, entailment grading, VERIFIED / QUALIFIED / RESEARCH REQUIRED modes.
The applications and grants across offices sharing priority claims to one original filing — the unit of global portfolio analysis.
The effective date a patent application claims — usually its first filing — against which novelty and prior art are judged.
Confidential business information with value from secrecy, protected by reasonable measures rather than registration.
Protection for original creative expression — ownership, infringement factors, licensing — highly fact- and jurisdiction-specific.